 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Local MT vs. web MT |
My topic was "Local MT vs. web MT". Hans Lenting changed it to "Slate vs public NMT". If you use web MT service eTranslation you can choose:
SMT (Moses or MT@EC) only ONE for all topics or choose from NMT for specialized (formal languge EU, different institution data) engines. |
|
|
eTranslation
Animation
35 sec Please wait 15 sec. |
|
|
|
SMT: SMT: other |
|
|
|
TMX in email from eTranslation
EU Formal Language |
|
|
| A link to forum | https://www.proz.com/forum/translation_theory_and_practice/344696-page2.html#2856445 | |
Hans Lenting wrote: Slate vs public NMT Jun 27 Milan Condak wrote: I am Slate Desktop user. |
Hello Slate!(My name is Milan) Slate is nice for companies and institutions that translate in the same subject field over and over. |
|
| My comment: | I have (more than) 20 engines for different domains. | |
| I have 22 engines in one notebook with Slate Connect |
Each engine imported into OmegaT has two folder: Recaser and SMT 
|
|
|
Select an engine in OmegaT I select EN-CS Europarl 2011 |
|
|
| Language pair |
I have TMX from Bible and I can make engine from it and wait for client with this domains. One my Interlingua-Czech engine contain 10 Bible'Books and by translating a novel there was a person who oft cite a bible, there was useful to choose this engine. None of big MT-players supports MT for Interlingua. |
|
| To translate in the same subject field over and over = rule for TM. TM is updating. By using SMT´engine it is not changing. An user will make new engine for new topic or new TMX. If s/he want. | ||
|
Example Source TMX from DGT |
|
|
| Ready CS-BG engine in Slate Desktop |
|
|
| Slate engines *.slate-eng |
|
